since about Victorian times (roughly 1837 on)+ photographs
i don't want to sound ignorant so please correct me if i am wrong....if the woman wore red back then,wasn't she considered wild or loose?
Thanks. Red could be considered a bit wild but I think she is meant to look like Little Red Riding Hood.
i don't want to sound ignorant so please correct me if i am wrong....if the woman wore red back then,wasn't she considered wild or loose?
ReplyDeleteThanks. Red could be considered a bit wild but I think she is meant to look like Little Red Riding Hood.
ReplyDelete